Friday, June 20, 2008

Backlash

Pos 60 question thrown at our group: How do we solve Poverty?

Now, a lot of people have asked, been asking, and in all probability will ask this question; young and old, rich and poor, you get it. Everyone. People have died asking this question, and people have died trying to answer it. Generations have preceded ours, encountering the same problem, the same wall they've been trying to tear down, go around, or go through. I stare at the question on the chalkboard, wondering how a handful of hotshot students could ever think of something as magnanimous as a solution to poverty, where so many have already failed.

What is poverty anyway?

It's not so much as lacking possessions, or adequate funds to provide one's self with basic needs. Poverty isn't really about living in the streets, or begging for money, or doing blue collar jobs that barely support your family of five. Poverty is something far more frightening that we create these materialistic definitions as facades to disillusion us from what poverty truly is.

Poverty is an Idea.

It is a way of thinking, a way of life, it is a principle. And the frightening thing about ideas is that they move things, they cause change, they affect the way human life operates. Poverty embeds in us this concept that life is something static, something that we cannot change, and that humanity is powerless to the system that it worships. Poverty, in its very existence, promotes the social disparity that it has condemned for so long. Poverty is a thorn in society's paw, a painful reminder of our exiguity to lift ourselves even from the most basic of problems. Poverty tells us there is a "scarcity of resources", when what really is happening is a "misappropriation of resources".

Poverty is a perspective, a way of viewing life as something fleeting, and that because humanity is powerless to change society, all he can do is tend to himself. Poverty promotes consumerism, it puts a price tag on everything, and where you stand in the system is grossly dictated by how much you can buy.

But poverty's persistence to exist lies in the one thing that it promises people; happiness. Poverty gives people an opportunity to escape their problems, a choice to forsake this world of all earthly attachments and hardships. Poverty gives people an excuse to be lazy, to be complacent of the status quo. Poverty ceases forms of questioning, using instead excuses normalcy or inadequacy of human ability, or the preponderance of the powers that be.

To be satisfied with what you have now, without even striving harder to achieve something far more greater is just simply inhuman.

But poverty does have its perks. In our country, it is the poverty that votes. Due to this form of thinking, they only ask you please them come election day for them to vote for you. In our country, it is the poverty that consumes the most. Television and Film mold and shape themselves into what we have today for television and film; a pathetic and grotesque window to our fractured society, devoid of any form of intelligence and integrity. In our country, products and businesses are reaping millions and millions of pesos from selling everything in lilliputian packagings, because poverty only asks you "buy enough for the day", and that "buying big costs too much". In our country, the youth is educated to be good employees, instead of being taught how to be good leaders.

In our country, it is better to read about Rizal than to live like him.

But what do we do about poverty?

I'll tell you what we ought to do. We think about it. We talk about it. We write about it. Because it is in the form of discourse that ideas are resolved. When it comes to poverty in our country, the one thing we should really do is discuss it, because there isn't enough we know about poverty for us to really solve it. Generations before us have done so much to achieve so little, would we make the same mistake? I'm not saying that the past generations never thought about what they did to solve poverty, but all I'm saying is that maybe we ought to stop giving them cash subsidies that last for a day and start giving them a way to make money for life. Because what we are fighting is not a scarcity of resources, or a lack of employment, or a weakening economy.

What we are fighting is a culture of apathy, a religion of complacency, a disgusting way of life.

written by:

Leiron Conrad T. Martija

cross-posted at:

Tinted Reflections

4 comments:

rr raneses said...

thanks leiron for the highly perceptive and critical points. i am reminded of antonio gramsci's point: "to ask the question is to answer the very question". and yet, we - who provide discursive solutions to the question - must contend with the real-ness of poverty. each time i walk along katipunan at night from my caffeine fix (the level of my theorizing depends a lot on what drink i get haha), i am disturbed about how far away my discursive - even if also real - solutions are from this much more visceral reality of children sleeping on cartons, beside a manhole where huge, really huge, rats emerge in the darkness of the night.

Anonymous said...

I think your points are very valid, and it's quite a new way of looking at poverty, the whole "beyond the material emptiness" concept (though it might not be new and I just haven't head of it yet), and yes very well said.

However my one problem is that I sort of sense for your piece that you think people choose to be poor, that it is a luxury people opt for so they can be pitied and somehow gain the higher ground through numbers or something. I think that we should not generalize the way poverty affects people. There are those who try their best to escape from poverty, and there are those who are like what you have described.

That being said, I think the best thing we can do for poverty is to educate people, livelihood programs, something like that. Things that enable them to survive in our society for more than a day, as you mentioned.

No we can't solve poverty right now. I don't think we can totally wipe it out. That's a problem in itself. Solving poverty is a process, one that will take many presidential terms, many congress sessions, much much time. People don't seem to realize that and blame those tasked to serve the public when the solution is not quick fix. Though they might have some fault in it, I think people need to see that totally erasing poverty will need time. One thing we can do, though we're not going to finish, we can start. We can continue.

On a side note, I do agree with how poverty can be more than just not having money or things, but I doubt people who are poor think that far. It might be becoming some unconscious state of mind for them, but to them poverty is still the fact that their kids can't go to school and that they might not be able to eat tomorrow. I'm not being condescending or anything. Just a speculation. :)

-Patricia Sta.Maria

Anonymous said...

RR - I think the danger in perceiving poverty as such is that there is a tendency romanticize the issue. But I think that romanticizing issues (or at least, involving emotions) give certain issues more value, in that it provides common ground to the members of society.

Patty - By my calling poverty a way of life, it does not necessarily mean that it is a choice. It is a consequence, brought about by that way of thinking. I believe that everyone, at some point in time, was given an opportunity to live a life he/she wanted. What I mean is, poverty is that way of thinking that takes us down a road to shanties and informal settlements. I know that it won't be solved now or probably anytime in the near future, but I just think we ought to know more about what we're facing before we actually go head-to-head on it.

Anonymous said...

"I believe that everyone, at some point in time, was given an opportunity to live a life he/she wanted."

As much as I'd like to believe this is true, I don't agree with it. Many are born into lives which allow little, if any growth or progress. I'm not saying that there are none of those who are lost to poverty, who are defeated and resign themselves to the shanti life. There are certainly people like that, and you are very right in mentioning that there are people with that situation, but there are people who are not. There are people who are never given the chance, or find themselves cut off from the opportunity, no matter how hard they try. This might border on romanticizing the plight of the poor, but I think it greatly affects how we deal with them.

To know more about the issue is to look at it from more than just one side, which is why things like this (public discussion)are really beneficial. :D

-Patricia Sta. Maria